لابی‌گری شرکت، دیدگاه و محافظه‌کاری حسابداری

*       Adhikari, A., Derashid, C., Zhang, H.(2006). Public policy, political connections, and effective tax rates: Longitudinal evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 25: 574-595.

*       Aggarwal, R. K., Meschke, F., Wang, T. Y. (2012). Corporate political donations: Investment or agency? Business and Politics, 14(1): 1-10.

*       Agrawal, A., Knoeber, C. R. (2001). Do some outside directors play a political role? Journal of Law and Economics, 44: 179-198.

*       Ahmed, A., Duellman, S. (2007). Accounting conservatism and board of director characteristics: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 43(2-3): 411-437.

*       Anderson, T. W., Hsiao, C. (1982). Formulation and estimation of dynamic models using panel data. Journal of Econometrics, 18: 47-82.

*       André, P., Filip, A. Paugam, L. (2015). The effect of mandatory IFRS adoption on conditional conservatism in Europe. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 42: 482 514.

*       Ball, R., Kothari, S. P., Nikolaev, V. (2013). On estimating conditional conservatism. The Accounting Review, 88(3): 755-787.

*       Ball, R., Robin, A., Wu, J. S. (2003). Incentives versus standards: Properties of accounting income in four East Asian countries. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 36: 235-270.

*       Ball, R., Shivakumar, L. (2005). Earnings quality in UK private firms: Comparative loss recognition timeliness. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39: 83-128.

*       Bartel, A. P., Thomas, L. G. (1987). Predation through regulation: The wag and profit effects of the occupational safety and health administration and the environmental protection agency. Journal of Law and Economics, 20: 239-264.

*       Barth, M. E., Beaver, W. H., Landsman, W. R. (1998). Relative valuation roles of equity book value and net income as a function of financial health. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 25: 1-34.

*       Bar-Yosef, S., Callen, J. L., Livnat, J. (1987). Autoregressive modeling of earnings investment causality. Journal of Finance, 42: 11-28.

*       Basu, S. (1997). The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24: 3-37.

*       Baysinger, B. D. (1984). Domain maintenance as an objective of business political activity: An expanded typology. Academy of Management Review, 9(2): 248-258.

*       Baysinger, B. D., Woodman, R. (1982). Dimensions of the public affairs/government relations function in major American corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 3: 27-41.

*       Beaver, W. H., Ryan, S. G.(2005). Conditional and unconditional conservatism: Concepts and modeling. Review of Accounting Studies, 10(2&3): 269-309.

*       Bebchuk, L. A., Jackson, R. J. (2013). Shining light on corporate political spending. The Georgetown Law Journal, 101: 923-967.

*       Bertrand, M., Bombardini, M., Trebbi, F. (2011). Is it whom you know or what you know? An empirical assessment of the lobbying process. Working paper, National Bureau of Economic Research.

*       Bombardini, M., Trebbi, F. (2011). Votes or money? Theory and evidence from the US congress. Journal of Public Economics, 95: 587-611.

*       Brasher, H., Lowery, D. (2006). The corporate context of lobbying activity. Business and Politics, 8: 1-23.

*       Burnett, B., Chen, H., Gunny, K. (2014). Auditor-provided lobbying service and audit quality. Working paper, University of Colorado at Denver.

*       Cahan, S. F., 1992. The effect of antitrust investigations on discretionary accruals: A refined test of the political-cost hypothesis. The Accounting Review, 67(1): 77-95.

*       Callen, J. L., Guan Y., Qiu, J. (2010). The market for corporate control and accounting conservatism. Working paper, University of Toronto.

*       Cano-Rodríguez, M., Núñez-Nickel, M. (2015). Aggregation bias in estimates of conditional conservatism: Theory and evidence. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 42: 51-78.

*       Carroll, A. B., Buchholtz, A. K. (2008). Business & society – Ethics and stakeholder management, 7th Edition. Cengage Learning.

*       Chan, L. H., Chen, T., Janakiraman, S. N., Radhakrishnan, S. (2012). Reexamining the relationship between audit and nonaudit fees: Dealing with weak instruments in two-stage least squares estimation. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 27: 299-324.

*       Chaney, P. K., Faccio, M., Parsley, D. (2011). The quality of accounting information in politically connected firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 51: 58-76.

*       Chen, C. J., Ding, Y., Kim, C. F.  (2010). High-level politically connected firms, corruption, and analyst forecast accuracy around the world. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(9), 1505-1524.

*       Chen, H., Parsley, D., Yang, Y. (2015). Corporate lobbying and financial performance. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 42(3-4): 444-481.

*       Coates, J. (2012). Corporate politics, governance, and value before and after Citizens United. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 9: 657-696.

*       Correia, M. M. (2012). Political connections, SEC enforcement, and accounting quality. Working paper, London Business School.

*       Cull, R., Xu, L. C. (2005). Institutions, ownership and finance: The determinants of profit reinvestment among Chinese firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 77: 117-146.

*       Dean, T. J., Vryza, M., Fryxell, G. E. (1998). Do corporate PACs restrict competition? An empirical examination of industry PAC contributions and entry. Business and Society, 37(2): 135-156.

*       Dhaliwal, D., Huang, S., Khurana, I. K., Pereira, R. (2011). Product market competition and accounting conservatism. Working paper, University of Arizona.

*       Drutman, L. (2012). The business of America is lobbying: Explaining the growth of corporate political activity in Washington, DC. Working paper.

*       Drutman, L. (2015). The business of America is lobbying: How corporations became politicized and politics became more corporate. Oxford University Press.

*       Dyck, A., Zingales, L. (2004). Private benefits of control: An international comparison. The Journal of Finance, 59(2): 537-600.

*       Faccio, M. (2002). Politically connected firms: Can they squeeze the state? Unpublished working paper, Purdue University.

*       Faccio, M. (2006). Politically connected firms. American Economic Review, 96: 369-386.

*       Faccio, M. (2010). Differences between politically connected and nonconnected firms: A cross-country analysis. Financial Management, 39: 905-928.

*       Faccio, M., Masulis, R. W., McConnell, J. J. (2006). Political connections and corporate bailouts. Journal of Finance, 61: 2597-2635.

*       Goldman, E., Rocholl, J., So, J. (2013). Political connected boards of directors and the allocation of procurement contracts. Review of Finance, 17(5): 1617-1648.

*       Gow, I. D., Ormazabal, G., Taylor, D. J. ( 2010). Correcting for cross-sectional and time-series dependence in accounting research. The Accounting Review, 85: 483-512.

*       Granger, C. W. J.( 1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral models. Econometrica, 37: 424-438.

*       Greenwood, R., Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: The big five accounting firms. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1): 27-48.

*       Grier, K. B., Michael, C. M., Roberts, B. E. (1994). The determinants of industry political activity, 1978-1986. American Political Science Review, 88: 911-926.

*       Grossman, G. M., Helpman, E. (1994). Protection for sale. American Economic Review, 84: 833-850.

*       Grossman, G. M., Helpman, E. (2002). Integration versus outsourcing in industry equilibrium. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117: 85-120.

*       Guedhami, O., Pittman, J. A., Saffar, W. (2014). Auditor choice in politically connected firms. Journal of Accounting Research, 52(1): 107-162.

*       Hall, S. C. (1993). Political scrutiny and earnings management in the oil refining industry. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 12: 325-351.

*       Hill, M. D., Kelly, G. W., Lockhart, G. B., Van Ness, R. A. (2013). Determinants and effects of corporate lobbying. Financial Management, 42(4): 931-957.

*       Johnson, S., Mitton, T. (2003). Cronyism and capital controls: Evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Financial Economics, 67: 351-382.

*       Jones, J. (1991). Earnings management during import relief investigations. Journal of Accounting Research, 29: 193-228.

*       Khan, M., Watts, R. L. (2009). Estimation and empirical properties of a firm-year measure of accounting conservatism. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 48: 132-150.

*       Khwaja, A. I., Mian, A. (2005). Do lenders favor politically connected firms? Rent provision in an emerging financial market. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120: 1371-1411.

*       Kim, C., Yang, Z., Zhou, O. (2013). Politically connected boards and audit pricing: U.S. Evidence. Working paper. City University of Hong Kong.

*       King, B. G. (2008). A political mediation model of corporate response to social movement activism. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53: 395-421.

*       King, B. G., Soule, S. A. (2007). Social movements as extra-institutional entrepreneurs: The effect of protests on stock price returns. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52: 413-442.Kostova, T.,

*       Roth, K., Dacin, M. T. (2008). Institutional theory in the study of multinational corporations:A critique and new directions. Academy of Management Review, 33: 994-1006.

*       Kothari, S. P., Ramanna, K., Skinner, D. J. (2010). Implications for GAAP from an analysis of positive research in accounting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50: 246-286.

*       LaFond, R., Roychowdhury, S. (2008). Managerial ownership and accounting conservatism. Journal of Accounting Research, 46: 101-135.

*       LaFond, R., Watts, R. L. (2008). The information role of conservatism. The Accounting Review, 83: 447-478.

*       Lara, J. M. G., Osma, B. G., Penalva, F. (2009). The economic determinants of conditional conservatism. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 36(3&4): 336-372.

*       Lennox, C. S., Park, C. W.(2006). The informativeness of earnings and management’s issuance of earnings forecasts. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42: 439-458.

*       Lenway, S., Jacobson, C. K., Goldstein, J. (1990). To lobby or to petition: The political environment of U.S. trade policy. Journal of Management, 16: 119-134.

*       Lev, B., Petrovits, C., Radhakrishnan, S. (2010). Is doing good good for you? How corporate charitable contributions enhance revenue growth. Strategic Management Journal, 31(2): 182-200.

*       Li, K., Prabhala, N. (2007). Self-selection models in corporate finance. In B.E. Eckso (Ed.), Handbook of corporate finance: Empirical corporate finance (pp. 37-86). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science B.V.

*       Li, X. (2015). Accounting conservatism and the cost of capital: An international analysis. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 42: 555-582.

*       Mahood, H. R. (1990). Interest group politics in America. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

*       Martin, G. W., Thomas, W. B., Wieland, M. M. (2016). S&P 500 membership and managers’ supply of conservative financial reports. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 43: 543-571.

*       Morck, R., Sepanski, J., Yeung, B. (2001). Habitual and occasional lobbyers in the US steel industry: An EM algorithm pooling approach. Economic Inquiry, 39: 365-379.

*       Kong,X., Radhakrishnan,S., Tsang.,A.(2017). Corporate Lobbying, Visibility and Accounting Conservatism, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Vol. 44, Issue 5-6, pp. 527-557.

*       Petersen, M. A. (2009). Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. Review of Financial Studies, 22: 435-480.

*       Pope, P. F., Walker, M. (2003). Ex-ante and ex-post accounting conservatism, asset recognition and asymmetric earnings timeliness. Lancaster University and University of Manchester.

*       Ramanna, K., Roychowdhury, S. (2010). Elections and discretional accruals: Evidence from 2004. Journal of Accounting Research, 48: 445-475.

*       Ryan, S. G. (2006). Identifying conditional conservatism. European Accounting Review, 15: 511-525.

*       Schuler, D. A. (1996). Corporate political strategy and foreign competition: The case of the steel industry. Academy of Management Journal, 39: 720-737.

*       Smith, J. (2016). U.S. political corruption and firm financial policies. Journal of Financial Economics, 121(2): 350-367.

*       Watts, R. L.(1977). Corporate financial statements: A product of the market and political processes. Australian Journal of Management, 2: 53-75.

*       Watts, R. L. (2003a). Conservatism in accounting, Part I: Explanations and implications. Accounting Horizons, 17: 207-221.

*       Watts, R. L. (2003b). Conservatism in accounting, Part II: evidence and research opportunities. Accounting Horizons, 17: 287-301.

*       Watts, R. L., Zimmerman, J. L. (1978). Towards a positive theory of the determination of accounting standards. The Accounting Review, 53: 112-134.

*       Yu, F., Yu, X. (2011). Corporate lobbying and fraud detection. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 46(6): 1865-1891.