رابطه متقابل رهبری اشتراکی با تاکتیک‌های نفوذ نرم و سخت بر اساس مدل کارسون (مورد مطالعه: کارکنان ذوب آهن اصفهان)

Allen. N.J. & Smith, C.A. Mayer, J.P. & (1993). Commitment to organizations and Occupations: Extension and test of a three. Component Conceptualization, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 78, No.4, PP: 538-551.

Alvin,T.S., & Stasser,S. (2015), A Longitudinal Analysis of the antecedents of organizational commitment, Academy of Management Journal, Vol 27. P: 154.

Bamarino, M. C., Pearce, C. L., & Kohles, J. C. (2006). The importance of self-and shared leadership in team based knowledge work: A meso-level model of leadership dynamics. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21 (4),PP: 296–318.

Blanchard, N.S. & Ani, R.A. (2015), Sex and Position as Predictor of organizational Commitment, Academy of Management Journal, Vol 29, No.3, P: 1-485.

Carless, S. A., & Yalk & Chavor, C. (2005). The measurement of cohesion in work teams. Small Group Research, 31 (1).

Carson, J. B., Tesluk, P. E., & Marrone, J. A. (2007). Shared leadership in teams: An investigation of antecedent conditions and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 50 (5), PP: 87–1234.

Cohen, A. (1994). Antecedents of organizational commitment, Journal of organizational Behavior, Vol.13, No.6. PP: 539-542.

 Davis Stanley M. (1984). Management Corporate Culture, Ballinger Publishing Company.

Desler, Dyps. (2012). Organization theory, Chapter 12: Motivation and innovation. Building Commitment, Newyork, Prentice Hall.

Dyne, L.V. & Ang, S. (1998). Organizational Citizenship Behavior of Contingent Workers in Singapore, Academy of Management Journal, 41 (6): PP: 692-703.

Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33 (7).

Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2007 (1), PP: 112–133.

Johnson, T. W., & Stinson, J. E. (1975). Role ambiguity, role conflict, and satisfaction: moderating effects of individual differences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60 (3), PP: 333-329.

Lee, D. S., et al. An analysis of shared leadership, diversity, and team creativity in an e-learning environment. Computers in Human Behavior (2014)10-64

Mason, C. M., & Griffin, M. A. (2002). Group task satisfaction: Applying the construct of job satisfaction to groups. Small Group Research, 33.

Mason, C. M., & Griffin, M. A. (2002). Group task satisfaction: Applying the construct of job satisfaction to groups. Small Group Research, 33.

Mason, Claire M., & Griffin, Mark A. (2003). Identifying group task satisfaction at work. Small Group Research, 34.

Mayer, J.P.& Allen, N.J. (1984). Testing the side-Bet theory of organizational commitment, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 69, No.3, PP: 379.

Mayer, K.c & Schoorman, F.d. (1998). Differentiating Antecedents of organizational commitment: a test of march & Simons model, Journal of organizational Behavior. Vol.19.PP: 15-28.

Mehra, A., Smith, B. R., Dixon, A. L., & Robertson, B. (2006). Distributed leadership in teams: The network of leadership perceptions and team performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 17 (3).

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.

Morison, M., & Moir, J. (1998). The role of computer software in the analysis of qualitative data: Efficient clerk, research assistant or Trojan horse? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 28 (1).

Morris, J. H., & Moberg, D. J. (1994). Work organizations as contexts for trust and betrayal. In T. Sarbin, R. Carney, & C. Eoyang (Eds.), Citizen Espionage: Studies in trust and betrayal. Westport, CT: Praeger 4.

Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M. & Porter, L.M. (1979) The measurement of organizational commitment, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14, pp. 224–247.

Nelson, C. (2016). The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. Psychological Bulletin, 115 (2).

Pearce, C. L. (2004). The future of leadership: Combining vertical and shared leadership to transform knowledge work. Academy of Management Executive, 18 (1).

Pearce, C. L., & Conger, J. A. (2003). Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Pearce, C. L., & Sims, H. P., Jr. (2002). Vertical versus shared leadership as predictors of the effectiveness of change management teams: An examination of aversive,directive, transactional, transformational, and empowering leader behaviors. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6.

Podsakoff, P. M. (2000). Organizational Citizenship Behavior: A Critical Review ofthe Theoretical and Empirical Literature and Suggestions for FutureResearch. Journal of Management, 26: PP: 513-563.

Rabinz, E. M., (2010). An analysis of predictors of team satisfaction in product development teams with differing levels of virtualness. R&D Management, (5)39.

Ryps, C. L., & Sims, H. P., Jr. (2012). Shared leadership: Toward a multi-level theory of leadership. Advances in the Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams, 7.

Serban, A., & Roberts, A.J.B. Exploring antecedents and outcomes of shared leadership in a creativecontext: A mixed-methods approach, The Leadership Quarterly (2016), http: //dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.01.009.

Steers, Maron, Carson. Telsok (2016). Motivation and work Behavior, Corporations, Culture and Commitment, Newyork, Mc Graw-Hill inc.

Tidd, S. T., McIntyre, H. H., & Friedman, R. A. (2004). The importance of role ambiguity and trust in conflict perception: Unpacking the task conflict to relationship conflict linkage. International Journal of Conflict Management, 15 (4), PP: 64–380

Vander berg, J. (1992). Examining the Causal order of Job Satisfaction and organizational commitment, Journal of management. Vol.28, No.1, PP: 153-156.

Wood, M. S., & Fields, D. (2007). Exploring the impact of shared leadership on management team member job outcomes. Baltic Journal of Management, 2 (3), PP: 251–272.

Yamarino, F. J., Salas, E., (2012). Collectivistic leadership approaches: Putting the «we” in leadership science and practice. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 5 (4).