دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم و تحقیقات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات50
تعداد شماره‌ها2,232
تعداد مقالات20,475
تعداد مشاهده مقاله25,230,226
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله22,862,598
Yenice, Serhat, Karadayı Yenice, Tülay. (1399). Cultural Heritage Management Model for Yesemek Archaeological Site, Gaziantep, Turkey. , 10(3), 5-12. doi: 10.30495/ijaud.2020.15950
Serhat Yenice; Tülay Karadayı Yenice. "Cultural Heritage Management Model for Yesemek Archaeological Site, Gaziantep, Turkey". , 10, 3, 1399, 5-12. doi: 10.30495/ijaud.2020.15950
Yenice, Serhat, Karadayı Yenice, Tülay. (1399). 'Cultural Heritage Management Model for Yesemek Archaeological Site, Gaziantep, Turkey', , 10(3), pp. 5-12. doi: 10.30495/ijaud.2020.15950
Yenice, Serhat, Karadayı Yenice, Tülay. Cultural Heritage Management Model for Yesemek Archaeological Site, Gaziantep, Turkey. , 1399; 10(3): 5-12. doi: 10.30495/ijaud.2020.15950

Cultural Heritage Management Model for Yesemek Archaeological Site, Gaziantep, Turkey

International Journal of Architecture and Urban Development
دوره 10، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 37، مهر 2020، صفحه 5-12  XML اصل مقاله (1.09 M)
نوع مقاله: Applied Article
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30495/ijaud.2020.15950
نویسندگان
Serhat Yenice email orcid 1؛ Tülay Karadayı Yeniceorcid 2
1Associate Professor, Faculty of Fine Arts and Architecture, Hasan Kalyoncu University, Gaziantep, Turkey.
2Assis‌tant Professor, Faculty of Fine Arts and Architecture, Hasan Kalyoncu University, Gaziantep, Turkey.
چکیده
This study aims to build a model for the management and institutional organization to conservation and development of the Yesemek archaeological site in Gaziantep, Turkey. The scope of this research is the Yesemek archaeological site, which is known as the Yesemek Stone Quarry and Sculpture Workshop. Yesemek is the first outdoor sculpture workshop known in his‌tory. It is significant to preserve the Yesemek archaeological site, which has a unique value in Anatolian and Mesopotamian cultures with its original value and to pass on to the next generations. However, multidirectional planning and implementation processes are needed to protect and improve the area. The management of this complex process requires an institutional organization model based on the principles of efficiency participation, cooperation, transparency, and sustainability. As a result of the research, a model of cultural heritage management consisting of governance, spatial, socio-economic, cultural, and financial programs for sustainable protection and improvement in the case of Yesemek archaeological site is defined.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Conservation؛ Cultural sus‌tainability؛ Yesemek؛ Gaziantep
مراجع
Alkım, U. (1948). Karatepe Kazısının Arkeolojik Sonuçları. Belleten, XII(47), 533-546.
Alkım, U. (1957). Yesemek Taş Ocağı ve Heykeltraşlık Atelyesi. Belleten, XXI(83), 359-376.
Alkım, U. (1974). Yesemek Taş Ocağı ve Heykel Atölyesinde Yapılan Kazı ve Araştırmalar. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu.
Demas, M. (2002). Planning for Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites: A Value-Based Approach. J. Teutónico, & G. Palumbo içinde, Management Planning for Archaeological Sites (s. 27-54). Los Angles: The Getty Conservation Ins‌titute.
Duru, R. (2004). Eski Önasya Dünyasının En Büyük Heykel Atelyesi Yesemek. İs‌tanbul: Türsap Kültür Yayınları.
Edson, G. (2004). Heritage: Pride or passion, product or service?. International Journal of Heritage S‌tudies, 10, 333-348.
Feilden, B. M., & Jokilehto, J. (1998). Management Guidelines for World Cultural Heritage Sites. Rome: ICCROM.
Jokilehto, J. (2006). Considerations on authenticity and integrity in the world heritage context. City & Time, 2(1), 1-16.
Jones, K. (2007). Caring for archaeological sites: Practical guidelines for protecting and managing archaeological sites in New Zealand. Wellington: Department of Conservation.
Mason, R., & Avrami, E. (2002). Heritage Values and Challenges of Conservation Planning. &. G. J. Teutónico içinde, Management Planning for Archaeological Sites (s. 19-26). Los Angles: The Getty Conservation Ins‌titute.
Mellink, M. (1977). Archaeology in Asia Minor. American Journal of Archaeology, 81(3), 289-321.
Özcan, K., & Yenice, M. (2008). Sus‌tainability of archaeological heritage: A method proposal for conservation–development s‌trategy case s‌tudy for Konya Alaaddin Hill, Turkey. International Journal of Human Sciences, 5(1), 1-16.
Rojay, B., Heimann, A., & Toprak, V. (2001). Neotectonic and Volcanic characteris‌tics of the Karasu fault zone (Anatolia, Turkey) The Transition. Geodinamica Acta (14), 197-212.
Temizsoy, I. (1991). 1990 Yılı Yesemek Taşocağı ve Heykel Atölyesi Kazı ve Res‌torasyon Çalışmaları. XII. Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı (s. 255-274). Çanakkale: Kültür Bakanlığı Anıtlar ve Müzeler Genel Müdürlüğü.
Thomas, L., & Middleton, J. (2003). Guidelines for Management Planning of Protected Areas. Bes‌t Practice Protected Area Guidelines Series No. 10. UK: IUCN Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge.

آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 441
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 332


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب