آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 50 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 2,232 |
| تعداد مقالات | 20,475 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 25,234,759 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 22,868,837 |
Cross-inefficiency with the Variable Returns to Scale in DEA | ||
| International Journal of Industrial Mathematics | ||
| دوره 12، شماره 4، آبان 2020، صفحه 345-355 اصل مقاله (461.18 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
B. Asadi   1؛ H. Nasseri 1؛ Farhad Hosseinzade Lotfi 2
| ||
| 1Department of Mathematics, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran | ||
| 2Department of Mathematics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| The cross-efficiency ranking method is a well-known method in DEA which is frequently used under the constant returns to scale assumption; while various applications exist based on the variable returns to scale (VRS). This is due to the presence of negative input-oriented VRS cross-efficiencies. In this paper, each cross-efficiency is replaced by an equivalent distance measure as inefficiency measure. Then, the cross-inefficiency method is developed under the VRS assumption. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Data Envelopment Analysis؛ Negative cross-efficiency؛ Variable returns to scale؛ Cross-inefficiency؛ VRS production possibility set | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
[1] L. Angulo-Meza, J. C. C. B. Soares deMello, E. G. Gomes, L. Biondi Neto, Eficiencias negativas em modelos DEA-BCC: como surgem e como evita-las, VII Simposio de Pesquisa Operacional e Logistica da Marinha-SPOLM (2004). [2] R. D. Banker, Estimating most productive scale size using data envelopment analysis, European Journal of Operational Research 17 (1984) 35-44. [3] R. D. Banker, A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper, Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management science 30 (1984) 1078-1092. [4] M. Carrillo, J. M. Jorge, An alternative neutral approach for cross-efficiency evaluation, Computers & Industrial Engineering 120 (2018) 137-145. [5] A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper, E. Rhodes, Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, European journal of operational research 2 (1978) 429-444. [6] A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper, A. Y. Lewin, L. M. Seiford, Data envelopment analysis: Theory, methodology, and applications, Springer Science & Business Media (2013). [7] L. Chen, Y. M. Wang, DEA target setting approach within the cross efficiency framework, Omega (2019) 10-20. [8] W. Chen, K. Zhou, S. Yang, Evaluation of Chinas electric energy efficiency under environmental constraints: A DEA cross efficiency model based on game relationship. Journal of Cleaner Production 164 (2017) 38-44. [9] W. W. Cooper, L. M. Seiford, K. A. Tone, A comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-solver software, Springer Science+ Business Media (2007). [10] J. C. C. S. de Mello, L. A. Meza, J. Q. da Silveira, E. G. Gomes, About negative efficiencies in cross evaluation BCC input oriented models European Journal of Operational Research 229 (2013) 732-737. [11] J. C. C. B. S. de Mello, M. P. E. Lins, E. G. Gomes, Contruction of a smoothed DEA frontier, Pesquisa operacional 22 (2002) 183-201. [12] S. S. Ganji, A. Rassafi, D. L. A. Xu, A double frontier DEA cross efficiency method aggregated by evidential reasoning approach for measuring road safety performance, Measurement 136 (2019) 668-688. [13] X. Huang, H. Jin, H. Bai, Vulnerability assessment of China’s coastal cities based on DEA cross-efficiency model, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 36 (2019) 101-109. [14] G. R. Jahanshahloo, M. SoleimaniDamaneh, A note on simulating weights restrictions in DEA: an improvement of Thanassoulis and Allen’s method, Computers & operations research 32 (2005) 1037-1044. [15] S. Lim, J. Zhu, DEA cross-efficiency evaluation under variable returns to scale, Journal of the Operational Research Society 66 (2015) 476-487. [16] H. H. Liu, Y. Y. Song, X. X. Liu, G. L. Yang, Aggregating the DEA prospect crossefficiency with an application to state key laboratories in China, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences (2020) 100-109. [17] M. Oral, O. Kettani, P. Lang, A methodology for collective evaluation and selection of industrial R& D projects, Management science 37 (1991) 871-885. [18] V. V. Podinovski, T. Bouzdine-Chameeva, Weight restrictions and free production in data envelopment analysis, Operations Research 61 (2013) 426-437. [19] T. R. Sexton, R. H. Silkman, A. J. Hogan, Data envelopment analysis: Critique and extensions, New Directions for Program Evaluation 11 (1986) 73-105. [20] H. Shi, Y. Wang, L. Chen, Neutral crossefficiency evaluation regarding an ideal frontier and anti-ideal frontier as evaluation criteria, Computers & Industrial Engineering 132 (2019) 385-394. [21] E. Thanassoulis, M. Kortelainen, R. Allen, Improving envelopment in data envelopment analysis under variable returns to scale, European journal of operational research 218 (2012) 175-185. [22] J. Wu, J. Chu, J. Sun, Q. Zhu, DEA crossefficiency evaluation based on Pareto improvement, European Journal of Operational Research 248 (2016) 571-579. [23] J. Wu, L. Liang, Y. Chen, DEA game cross-efficiency approach to Olympic rankings, Omega 37 (2009) 909-918. [24] Z. Yang, X. Wei, The measurement and influences of China’s urban total factor energy efficiency under environmental pollution: Based on the game cross-efficiency DEA, Journal of cleaner production 209 (2019) 439-450 [25] Y. Zhou, W. Liu, X. Lv, X. Chen, M. Shen, Investigating interior driving factors and cross-industrial linkages of carbon emission efficiency in China’s construction industry: Based on Super-SBM DEA and GVAR model, Journal of Cleaner Production 241 (2019)118-122. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 208 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 433 |
||
