دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم و تحقیقات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات50
تعداد شماره‌ها2,232
تعداد مقالات20,475
تعداد مشاهده مقاله25,233,602
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله22,867,290
Rahmani, Somayeh, Khounsiavash, Mohsen, Kazemi Matin, Reza, MOGHADAS, Zohreh. (1401). Reduction Difference Between the Profile weights in Stochastic cross-efficiency. , 8(36), 5-14.
Somayeh Rahmani; Mohsen Khounsiavash; Reza Kazemi Matin; Zohreh MOGHADAS. "Reduction Difference Between the Profile weights in Stochastic cross-efficiency". , 8, 36, 1401, 5-14.
Rahmani, Somayeh, Khounsiavash, Mohsen, Kazemi Matin, Reza, MOGHADAS, Zohreh. (1401). 'Reduction Difference Between the Profile weights in Stochastic cross-efficiency', , 8(36), pp. 5-14.
Rahmani, Somayeh, Khounsiavash, Mohsen, Kazemi Matin, Reza, MOGHADAS, Zohreh. Reduction Difference Between the Profile weights in Stochastic cross-efficiency. , 1401; 8(36): 5-14.

Reduction Difference Between the Profile weights in Stochastic cross-efficiency

Journal of New Researches in Mathematics
مقاله 1، دوره 8، شماره 36، آذر و دی 2022، صفحه 5-14  XML اصل مقاله (258.85 K)
نوع مقاله: research paper
نویسندگان
Somayeh Rahmani1؛ Mohsen Khounsiavash email 1؛ Reza Kazemi Matin2؛ Zohreh MOGHADAS1
1Department of Mathematics, Islamic Azad University Qazvin Branch, Qazvin, Iran
2Department of Applied Mathematics (Operations Research), Faculty of, Department of Mathematics, Islamic Azad UniversityTehran, Iran
چکیده
Cross-efficiency method is a useful tool for efficiency evaluation of decision-making units in data envelopment analysis. The issue of non-uniqueness of optimal weights in the cross-efficiency evaluation has reduced the usefulness of this powerful method. This paper introduces a new method for selection of weights profiles as the secondary goal in cross-efficiency with stochastic data. The issue of zero-weight which implies the exclusion of some variables from the assessments, is also addressed in the new proposed method. The provided weights selection method also reduces the weight disparity in the achieved weights profile. In the peer-restricted stochastic cross-efficiency evaluation, the new approach guarantees that different DMUs should not attach very different weights to the same variables. As the result, a common set of weights using the idea of similarity between sets of weights is achieved in the proposed computation method. Some numerical examples are also used for illustration and comparison purposes.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Data envelopment analysis؛ cross-efficiency؛ Stochastic cross-efficiency؛ difference between the weights
مراجع

[1] Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., & Rhodes, E., (1978), Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, European journal of operational Research, 2, 429-444.

 [2] Wu, J., Chu, J.F., Sun, J.S., & Zhu, Q.Y., (2016), DEA cross efficiency evaluation based on Pareto improvement, European Journal of Operational Research,248 (2),571-579.

[3] Moeini, M., Karimi, B., and Khorram, E., (2015) Modelling, Computation and Optimization in Information Systems and Management Sciences. Springer International Publishing. 487-498.

[4] Zhou, Z., Lin, L., Xiao, H., Ma, C., Wu, S., (2017), Stochastic network DEA models for two-stage systems under the centralized control organization mechanism, Doi : http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2017.06.005.

[5] Yang, C. C., (2014), An enhanced DEA model for decomposition of technical efficiency in banking, Journal of the Annals of Operations Research,167-185.

[6] Emrouznejad, A., & Yang, G. L., (2018), A survey and analysis of the first 40 years of scholarly literature in DEA, Socio‐Economic Planning Sciences, 61, 4–8.

[7] Liu, S.T., (2018), A DEA ranking method based on cross efficiency intervals and signal-to-noise ratio, Annals of Operations Research, 261(1-2), 207-232.

[8] Sexton, T. R., Silkman, R. H., and Hogan, A. J., (1986), Data envelopment analysis: critique and extensions. In: Silkman R H (Ed.) Measuring Efficiency: An Assessment of data Envelopment Analysis, Jossey-Bass San Francisco, Pp: 73–105.

[9] Anderson, T.R.., Hollings Worth, K.B., & Inman, L. B., (2002), The fixed weighting nature of a cross evaluation model, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 18, 249-255.

[10] Lim, S., and Zhu, J., (2014), DEA cross-efficiency evaluation under variable returns to scale, Journal of the Operational Research Society,1-12.

[11] Cui, Q., & Li, Y., (2015), Evaluating energy efficiency for airlines: an application of VFB-DEA, Journal of Air Transport Management, 44, 34–41.

[12] Doyle, J. R., and Green, R. H., (1994), Efficiency and cross-efficiency in DEA: derivations, meanings and uses, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 45 (5): 567–578.

[13] Cook, W. D., and Zhu, J., (2014), DEA Cobb–Douglas frontier and cross-efficiency, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 65(2): 265–268.

[14] Wu, J., Chu, J.F., Sun, J.S., & Zhu, Q.Y., (2016), DEA cross efficiency evaluation based on Pareto improvement, European Journal of Operational Research,248 (2),571-579.

[15] Liu, S.T., (2018), A DEA ranking method based on cross efficiency intervals and signal-to-noise ratio, Annals of Operations Research, 261(1-2), 207-232.

[16] Kao, C., Liu, S. (2018), Cross efficiency measurement and decomposition in two basic network systems, Omega,1-10.

[17] Wu, J., Chu, J. F., Sun, J. S., Zhu, Q. Y., & Liang, L., (2016), Extended secondary goal models for weights selection in DEA cross-efficiency evaluation, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 93, 143-151.

[18] Ramón, N., Ruiz, J. L., and Sirvent, I., (2010), On the choice of weights profiles in cross efficiency evaluations, European Journal of Operational Research, 207 (3):1564-1572.

[19] Soltanifar, M., Shahghobadi, S., (2013), Selecting a benevolent secondary goal model in data an envelopment analysis cross-efficiency evaluation by a voting, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences,159-167.

[20] Thompson, R. G., Singleton, F. D., Thrall, R. M., and Smith, B. A., (1986), Comparative site evaluations for locating a high-energy physics lab in Texas, Interfaces 16 (6): 35–49.

 [21] Ramón, N., Ruiz, J. L., Sirvent, I., (2011), Reducing differences between profiles of weights: A ‘‘peer-restricted’’ cross-efficiency evaluation, Omega, 39 (6): 634–641.

[22] Jahanshahloo, G. R., Hosseinzadeh Lofti, F., Yafari, and Maddahi, R., (2011), Selecting symmetric weights as a secondary goal in DEA cross efficiency evaluation, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 35(1): 544–549.

[23] Wu, J., Chu, J. F., Sun, J. S., Zhu, Q. Y., & Liang, L., (2016), DEA cross-efficiency evaluation based on satisfaction degree: an application to technology, (2016).

[24] Charles, V., Cornillier, F., (2017), Value of the Stochastic Efficiency in Data Envelopment Analysis, Expert Systems With Applications, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2017.03.061.

[25] Cooper, W.W., Honghui, D., Huang, Z. & Li, S.X., (2004), Chance constrained programming approaches to congestion in stochastic data envelopment analysis, European Journal of Operational Research,155 (2), 487-501.

[26] Cooper, W.W., Deng, H., Huang, Z., & Li, S.X., (2002), Chance constrained programming approaches to technical efficiencies and inefficiencies in stochastic data envelopment analysis, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 53, 1347–1356.

[27] Khodabakhshi, M., (2009), Estimating most productive scale size with stochastic data in data envelopment analysis, Economic Modelling, doi: 10. 1016.j. econmod.2009.03.002.

[28] Zhou, Z., Lin, L., Xiao, H., Ma, C., Wu, S., (2017), Stochastic network DEA models for two-stage systems under the centralized control organization mechanism, Doi : http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2017.06.005

آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 388
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 132


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب