دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم و تحقیقات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات50
تعداد شماره‌ها2,205
تعداد مقالات20,229
تعداد مشاهده مقاله24,122,430
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله22,069,787
Hemati, Davood, Esmayeelzadeh, Ali, KORDLOUIE, HAMIDREZA. (1399). Investigating the Effect of Excess Stock Returns Volatility on Investors’ Heterogeneous Perceptions: Investment Horizons Test. , 6(20), 53-66.
Davood Hemati; Ali Esmayeelzadeh; HAMIDREZA KORDLOUIE. "Investigating the Effect of Excess Stock Returns Volatility on Investors’ Heterogeneous Perceptions: Investment Horizons Test". , 6, 20, 1399, 53-66.
Hemati, Davood, Esmayeelzadeh, Ali, KORDLOUIE, HAMIDREZA. (1399). 'Investigating the Effect of Excess Stock Returns Volatility on Investors’ Heterogeneous Perceptions: Investment Horizons Test', , 6(20), pp. 53-66.
Hemati, Davood, Esmayeelzadeh, Ali, KORDLOUIE, HAMIDREZA. Investigating the Effect of Excess Stock Returns Volatility on Investors’ Heterogeneous Perceptions: Investment Horizons Test. , 1399; 6(20): 53-66.

Investigating the Effect of Excess Stock Returns Volatility on Investors’ Heterogeneous Perceptions: Investment Horizons Test

International Journal of Finance & Managerial Accounting
دوره 6، شماره 20، اردیبهشت 2021، صفحه 53-66  XML اصل مقاله (692.96 K)
نوع مقاله: Original Article
نویسندگان
Davood Hemati1؛ Ali Esmayeelzadeh email 1؛ HAMIDREZA KORDLOUIEorcid 2
1Department of Accounting, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2Department of Accounting, Eslamshahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده
The nature of each investment is not something but to make more profit and more returns for investors. Accordingly, shareholders always seek to control the potential risks of investment through better market intelligence. Nevertheless, excess stock returns volatility caused by impairment in predicting expected returns do not allow investor perceptions in a market to be unified, and most decisions will be affected by emotions even at higher horizons. The purpose of this research is to investigate the effect of excess stock returns volatility on heterogeneous perceptions of investors with the mediating role of investment horizons. The statistical population of the research is the companies listed at the Tehran Stock Exchange. By systematic elimination sampling, 89 companies were selected as the sample that was studied during the period 2013 to 2017. In this research, due to the dummy nature of the dependent variable, logistic regression was used to test the research hypotheses. The results showed that the effect of excess stock returns volatility on investors’ heterogeneous perceptions is positive and significant. It was also found that investment horizons exacerbated the positive impact of excess stock returns volatility on investors’ heterogeneous perceptions.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Excess stock returns volatility؛ Investors’ heterogeneous perceptions؛ Investment horizons test
مراجع
  • Adam, K., Marcet, A., Nicolini, J. P. (2016). Stock market volatility and learning. J. Finance 71 (1), 33–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12364.
  • Akdeniz, L., Salih, A. A., Ok, S. T. (2007). Are stock prices too volatile to be justified by the dividend discount model? Physica A 376, 433–444. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2006.10.097
  • Arif, S., Marshal, N. and Lombardi Yohn, T. (2016). Understanding The Relation Between Accruals and Volatility: A Real Options-based Investment Approach, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 62 (1): 65-86
  • Badavar Nahandi, Y., Sarafraz, E. (2018). The Relationship between Stock Mispricing and Corporate Investments with Emphasis on the Role of Financial Constraints and Time Horizon of Stockholders Investment. Financial Knowledge of Securities Analysis, 11(37), 119-132 (in Persian)
  • Bargeron, L., Lehn, K., Zutter, C. (2010). Sarbanes-Oxley and corporate risk-taking, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 49(1): 34-52.
  • Boswijk, H. P., Hommes, C., Manzan, S. (2007). Behavioral heterogeneity in stock prices. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 31(6): 1938–1970. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2007.01.001
  • Brandt, M, W., Brav, A., Graham, J. R. Kumar, A. (2010). “The idiosyncratic volatility puzzle: Time trend or speculative episodes?”, Review of Financial Studies, 23, 863–899
  • Brock, W. A., Hommes, C, H. (1998). Heterogeneous beliefs and routes to chaos in a simple asset pricing model. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 22 (8-9), 1235-1274.
  • Campbell, J, Y., Yeung, L, Ch., Viceira, L, M. (2003). A multivariate model of strategic asset allocation, Journal of Financial Economics 67, 41-80.
  • Chiarella, C., He, X, Z., Huang, W., Zheng, H. (2012). Estimating behavioral heterogeneity under regime switching. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 83(3): 446-460. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2012.02.014
  • Easley, D. and M. O’Hara (1992). Time and the Process of Security Price Adjustment, Journal of Finance, No. 47, pp. 577-604
  • Easley, D. and M. O'Hara (1987). Price, Trade Size, and Information in Securities Markets, Journal of Financial Economics, No. 19, pp. 69-90.
  • Eskandarli, T. (2019). Investigating the effect of Accruals on the Heterogeneity of investors’ Beliefs and their interaction on Stock Returns. Journal of Management Accounting and Auditing Knowledge, 8(29), 149-160 (In Persian)
  • Flavin, M. A. (1983). Excess volatility in the financial markets: a reassessment of the empirical evidence. J. Polit. Econ. 91 (6), 929–956.
  • Foucault, TH., Sraer. D., Thesmar, D, J. (2011). Individual Investors and Volatility, Journal of Finance, LXVI, 10(4): 12-31.
  • Franke, R., Westerhoff, F., 2012. Structural stochastic volatility in asset pricing dynamics: estimation and model contest. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 36 (8), 1193–1211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2011.10.004
  • Frijns, B., Lehnert, T., Zwinkels, R, C. (2010). Behavioral heterogeneity in the option market, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 34 (11): 2273-2287.
  • Ge, J., Wang, W., Wang, G. (2018). Moderation Effect of Investor and Manager Heterogeneous Beliefs on the Relationship of Advertising and Firm Value. Academy of Marketing Science World Marketing Congress, 2(12): 267-277
  • Grinbllate, M. and Han, B (2005). Prospect theory, mental accounting and momentum. Journal of finaneial economics, Vol. 78, Pp. 311-339
  • Hasas Yeganeh, Y., Salimi, M., Fattahi Dolatabadi, F. (2017). Investigating the Effect of Specific Charecteristics of Firms on the Relationship between Working Capital Accruals and Volatility of Stock Return. Journal of Iranian Accounting Review, 4(15), 23-44. doi: 10.22055/jiar.2018.22465.1134 (In Persian)
  • Hommes, C., Veld, D., (2017). Booms, busts and behavioral heterogeneity in stock prices. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 80, 101–124.
  • Hommes, CH. (2013) Behavioral rationality and heterogeneous expectations in complex economic systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Hubner, G., Lejeune, Th (2017). Mental Accounts with Horizon and Asymmetry Preferences, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2893697 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2893697
  • Ikeda, Sh, S., Zhang, Y. (2012). Heterogeneous Beliefs, A Short Sale Restriction and The Cross Section Of Stock Returns: An Evidence From China, GRIPS Discussion Paper
  • Janus, T., Jinjarak, Y., Uruyos, M. (2013). Sovereign Default Risk, Overconfident Investors and Diverse Beliefs: Theory and Evidence from a New Dataset on Outstanding Credit Default Swaps. Journal of Financial Stability, 9(10): 330-336
  • Karimi, K., Rahnamay-Roodposhti, F. (2015). Behavioral Biases and The Incentives of Earnings Management. Journal of Management Accounting and Auditing Knowledge, 13(52): 60-37 (In Persian)
  • Khani, A., Hoseyni, S, A., Khadem Khorasani, A. (2014). Study of Behavioral Pattern of Real Investors and Stock Returns, Stock Exchange Quarterly, Seventh Year, 26(2): 109-126 (In Persian)
  • Kim, Y., Nelson, C. R. (2014). Pricing stock market volatility: does it matter whether the volatility is related to the business cycle? J. Financ. Econom. 12 (2), 307–328. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jjfinec/nbt014
  • Koerniadi, H., Krishnamurti, Ch., Tourani-Rad, A. (2014). Corporate governance and risk-taking in New Zealand, International Journal of Managerial Finance, 10(4): 494-510
  • Lee, C. F., WU. C., Wei. K. C. J. (1990). The heterogeneous investment horizon and the capital asset pricing model: theory and implications,Journal of Financial and Quantitative analysis, 25(11): 361-376
  • Li, D., Li, R., Sun, Q. (2017). How the heterogeneity in investment horizons affects market trends, Applied Economics, 49(15): 1473-1482. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2016.1218433
  • Lia, Y. (2018). Heterogeneous Beliefs, Institutional Investors and Stock Returns – Evidence from China, EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, Heterogeneous Beliefs, Institutional Investors and Stock Returns – Evidence from China, ISSN: 1305-8223 (online) 1305-8215
  • Llorente, G. Michaeli, R. Saar, G., Wang, J. (2002). Dynamic volume-return relation of individual stocks, Review of Financial Studies, 15, 1005–1047.
  • Lof, M. (2015). Rational speculators, contrarians, and excess volatility. Manage. Sci. 61 (8), 1889–1901. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287
  • Long, V.T. (2008). Empirical Analysis of Stock Returns Volatility with Regime Change: The Case of Vietnam Stock Market. Working paper.
  • Marshall, J. F. (1994). The role of investment horizon in optimal portfolio sequencing (an intuitive demonstration in discrete time), Financial Review 29, 557-576.
  • Mayshar, J. (1983). On Divergence of Opinion and Imperfections in Capital Markets. American Economic Review, 73(2): 114-128
  • Miller, E. (1977). Risk, Uncertainty, and Divergence of Opinion. Journal of Finance 32, 1151-168.
  • Morris, S. (1996). Speculative Investor Behavior and Learning. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 111, 1111-1133.
  • Nagel, S. (2005). Short Sales, Institutional Investors and the Cross-section of Stock Returns. Journal of Financial Economics 78(10): 277-309
  • Ofek, E., Richardson, M. (2003). Dotcom mania: the rise and fall of internet stock prices. J. Finance 58 (3), 1113–1137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00560.
  • Onur, E. and U. Demirel (2009), “Measuring the Amount of Asymmetric Information in the Foreign Exchange Market”, California State University, Available at: http: //www.csus.edu (visited 8 May 2016).
  • Peng, E., Yan, E., Yan, M. (2016). Accounting Accruals, Heterogeneous Investor beliefs, and Stock Returns, Journal of Financial Stability, 4(24): 102-130.
  • Raee, R., Eslami Bidgoli, G., Mirzabayati, M. (2011). Stock Valuation and Behavioral Heterogeneity in Tehran Stock Exchange, 2(5), 103-126. doi: 10.22103/jak.2011.28 (In Persian)
  • Saranj, A., Tehrani, R., Abbasi Museloo, K., nadiri, M. (2018). Identifying the Trading Behaviors and Risk of Noise Traders in Iran Stock Market. Financial Management Strategy, 6(3), 31-58. doi: 10.22051/jfm.2018.19836.1639 (In Persian)
  • Schmitt, N., Westerhoff, F., 2017. Herding behaviour and volatility clustering in financial markets. Quant. Financ. 17 (8), 1187–1203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2016.1267391
  • Schwert, G. W. (2002). Stock volatility in the new millennium: how wacky is Nasdaq? J. Monet. Econ. 49(1): 3–26.
  • Shiller, R.J., 1981. Do stock prices move too much to be justified by subsequent changes in dividends? Am. Econ. Rev. 71 (3), 421–436.
  • Xu, Y., Li, B., Mcmillan, D. (2017). Behavioral heterogeneity and financial markets: Locked/crossed quotes under informationally efficient pricing, Journal of Cogent Economics & Finance, 5(1): 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2017.1384524
  • Zhang, W., Zhou, Zh., Xiong, X. (2019). Behavioral heterogeneity and excess stock price volatility in China, Finance Research Letters, 28(2): 348-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2018.06.004
  • Zhenxi, Ch. (2014). Estimating heterogeneous agent's behavior with different investment horizons in stock markets, econstor Journal, 5(3): 1-19. http://hdl.handle.net/10419/102268
  • Zhu, B., Niu, F., (2016). Investor sentiment, accounting information and stock price: Evidence from China, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 38: 125–134.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 180
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 205


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب