آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 50 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 2,079 |
| تعداد مقالات | 19,525 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 22,890,491 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 21,126,133 |
The combination of data Envelopment analysis and Balance scorecard card to provide an evaluation and ranking model and its application in R&D projects. | ||
| International Journal of Data Envelopment Analysis | ||
| مقاله 2، دوره 9، شماره 4، بهمن 2021، صفحه 15-22 اصل مقاله (245.76 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30495/ijdea.2022.68960.1177 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
Leila Taghizadetame 
| ||
| Islamic Azad university science and research branch | ||
| چکیده | ||
| The issue of assessing R&D projects is a kind of decision-making. This assessment includes multi-criteria indicators related to the organization's mission and purpose, the potential of strategy influence, the possibility of commercial and technical success, and so on. Therefore In this article, by combining two data coverage analysis techniques, data envelopment analysis DEA and balanced scorecard (BSC), a broad DEA model is developed, and the obtained model is used to evaluate R&D research and development projects. Efficient projects are identified, and Using the Anderson-Peterson model, efficient projects are ranked. At the end of the article, a brief comparison is made between DEA and DEA-BSC methods. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Data envelopment analysis؛ Balance scorecard card؛ Efficiency؛ R&D projects | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
[1] Oral M, Kettani O, Lang P. A methodology for collective evaluation and selection of industrial R&D projects. Management Science 1991; 37(7):871–85.
[2] Khouja M. The use of data envelopment analysis for technology selection. Computers and Industrial Engineering 1995;28: 123–32.
[3] Baker RC, Talluri S. A closer look at the use of data envelopment analysis for technology selection. Computers and Industrial Engineering 1997;32(1):101–8.
[4] Baker N, Freeland J. Recent advances in R&D benefit measurement and project selection methods. Management Science 1975;21(10):1164–75.
[5] Baker N, Pound WH. R&D project selection: where we stand. IEEE Transactions On Engineering Management 1964;11: 124–34.
[6] Danila N. Strategic evaluation and selection for R&D projects. R&D Management 1989;19(1):47–62.
[7] Schmidt RL, Freeland JR. Recent progress in modeling R&D project-selection processes. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 1992;39(2):189–201.
[8] Henriksen AD, Traynor AJ. A practical R&D project-selection scoring tool. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management1999;46(2):158–70.
[9] Kaplan RS, Norton DP. Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. Harvard Business Review 1996(January–February): p. 75–85.
[10] Hung-Yi Wua, Yi-Kuei Lin b, Chi-Hsiang Chang, Performance evaluation of extension education centers in universities based on the balanced scorecard. Evaluation and Program Planning 34 (2011) 37–50,
[11] Harel Eilat, Boaz Golany, Avraham Shtub, R&D project evaluation: An integrated DEA and balanced scorecard approach, Omega 36 (2008) 895 – 912
[12] A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper, E. Rhodes, Measuring the efficiency of decision making units, European Journal of Operational Research 2 (6) (1978) 429–444. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 19 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 18 |
||
