آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 50 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 2,105 |
| تعداد مقالات | 19,492 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 23,062,174 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 21,338,791 |
Measurement of damage to scale based on data envelopment analysis: A case study in Saman insurance company | ||
| International Journal of Finance & Managerial Accounting | ||
| دوره 8، شماره 30، شهریور 2023، صفحه 187-200 اصل مقاله (732.91 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30495/ijfma.2022.64350.1756 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
Seyyedeh Nasim shobeyri1؛ Mohsen Rostamy Malkhalifeh  2؛ Hashem Nikoomaram 3؛ Mohammadreza Miri Lavasani4
| ||
| 1Department of Accounting, Faculty of Management and Economics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Department of Mathematics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 3Department of Business Management, Faculty of Management and Economics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 4Department of HSE Management, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Insurance industry is one of the most important factors for the economic development of the countries. For example, insurance industry can be important for the stability of financial systems mainly because they are large investors in financial markets, because there are growing links between insurers and banks and because insurers are safeguarding the financial stability of households and firms by insuring their risks. Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) has been used as a powerful tool for the efficiency assessment of the different organizations, such as insurance industries, hospitals, schools and etc. This paper focuses on evaluation the insurance companies and explores a use of DEA to measure the insurers risk in these companies. For this purpose, we use the dataset of the car insurance policies of Saman insurance company during the years 2018-2019 and measure the Returns to Scale (RTS) for desirable outputs and Damages to Scale (DTS) for undesirable outputs. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Insurance industry؛ Data Envelopment Analysis؛ Returns to scale؛ Damage to scale؛ Undesirable output | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Adler, N., Friedman, L., & Sinuany-Stern, Z. (2002). Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context. European journal of operational research, 140(2), 249-265. 2) Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European journal of operational research, 2(6), 429-444. 3) Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management science, 30(9), 1078-1092. 4) Banker, R. D. (1984). Estimating most productive scale size using data envelopment analysis. European journal of operational research, 17(1), 35-44. 5) Banker, R. D., & Thrall, R. M. (1992). Estimation of returns to scale using data envelopment analysis. European Journal of operational research, 62(1), 74-84. 6) Banker, R. D., Chang, H., & Cooper, W. W. (1996). Equivalence and implementation of alternative methods for determining returns to scale in data envelopment analysis. European journal of operational research, 89(3), 473-481. 7) Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., & Lovell, C. K. (2013). The measurement of efficiency of production (Vol. 6). Springer Science & Business Media. 8) Fare, R., Färe, R., Fèare, R., Grosskopf, S., & Lovell, C. K. (1994). Production frontiers. Cambridge university press. 9) Førsund, F. R., Hjalmarsson, L., Krivonozhko, V. E., & Utkin, O. B. (2007). Calculation of scale elasticities in DEA models: direct and indirect approaches. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 28(1), 45-56. 10) Førsund, F. R., Hjalmarsson, L., Krivonozhko, V. E., & Utkin, O. B. (2007). Calculation of scale elasticities in DEA models: direct and indirect approaches. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 28(1), 45-56. 11) Fukuyama, H. (2000). Returns to scale and scale elasticity in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 125(1), 93-112 12) Golany, B., & Yu, G. (1997). Estimating returns to scale in DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 103(1), 28-37. 13) Hatami-Marbini, A., Beigi, Z. G., Hougaard, J. L., & Gholami, K. (2018). Measurement of returns-to-scale using interval data envelopment analysis models. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 117, 94-107. 14) Jabbari, A., Hosseinzadehlotfi, F., Jahanshahloo, G., & Rostamy-Malkhalifeh, M. (2019). Ranking all units with non-radial models in DEA. International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications, 10(2), 111-129. 15) Jahanshahloo, G. R., Soleimani-Damaneh, M., & Rostamy-Malkhalifeh, M. (2005). An enhanced procedure for estimating returns-to-scale in DEA. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 171(2), 1226-1238. 16) Miller, J. W., & Muir, W. A. (2020). A new perspective on returns to scale for truckload motor carriers. Journal of Business Logistics, 41(3), 236-258. International Journal of Finance and Managerial Accounting / 203 Vol.8 / No.30 / Summer 2023 17) Qi, Q., Jiang, Y., & Wang, D. (2020). Evaluation of Port Unified Efficiency Based on RAM-DEA Model for Port Sustainable Development. Journal of Coastal Research, 104(SI), 724-729. 18) Sharafi, H., Lotfi, F. H., Jahanshahloo, G., Rostamy-malkhalifeh, M., Soltanifar, M., & Razipour-GhalehJough, S. (2019). Ranking of petrochemical companies using preferential voting at unequal levels of voting power through data envelopment analysis. Mathematical Sciences, 13(3), 287-297. 19) Soleimani-Chamkhorami, K., Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, F., Jahanshahloo, G., & Rostamy-Malkhalifeh, M. (2020). A ranking system based on inverse data envelopment analysis. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics, 31(3), 367-385. 20) Soleimani-Damaneh, M., Jahanshahloo, G. R., Mehrabian, S., & Hasannasab, M. (2009). Scale elasticity and returns to scale in the presence of alternative solutions. Journal of computational and applied mathematics, 233(2), 127-136. 21) Soleimani-Damaneh, M., & Mostafaee, A. (2009). Stability of the classification of returns to scale in FDH models. European journal of operational research, 196(3), 1223-1228. 22) Sueyoshi, T., & Sekitani, K. (2005). Returns to scale in dynamic DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 161(2), 536-544. 23) Sueyoshi, T., & Goto, M. (2011). Measurement of returns to scale and damages to scale for DEA-based operational and environmental assessment: how to manage desirable (good) and undesirable (bad) outputs?. European Journal of Operational Research, 211(1), 76-89. 24) Sueyoshi, T., & Goto, M. (2013). Returns to scale vs. damages to scale in data envelopment analysis: An impact of US clean air act on coal-fired power plants. Omega, 41(2), 164-175. 25) Sueyoshi, T., & Sekitani, K. (2007a). Measurement of returns to scale using a non-radial DEA model: A range-adjusted measure approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 176(3), 1918-1946. 26) Sueyoshi, T., & Sekitani, K. (2007b). The measurement of returns to scale under a simultaneous occurrence of multiple solutions in a reference set and a supporting hyperplane. European Journal of Operational Research, 181(2), 549-570. 27) Zarepisheh, M., & Soleimani-Damaneh, M. (2009). A dual simplex-based method for determination of the right and left returns to scale in DEA. European journal of operational research, 194(2), 585-591. 28) De Witte, K., & Marques, R. C. (2011). Big and beautiful? On non-parametrically measuring scale economies in non-convex technologies. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 35(3), 213-226. 29) Zhu, J., & Shen, Z. H. (1995). A discussion of testing DMUs' returns to scale. European Journal of Operational Research, 81(3), 590-596. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 3 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 51 |
||
