تعداد نشریات | 50 |
تعداد شمارهها | 2,232 |
تعداد مقالات | 20,476 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 25,289,159 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 22,941,387 |
An Analytical Examination of the Degree of Capital Mobility in Iran Reappraisal of Feldstein-Horioka Relationship | ||
International Journal of Finance & Managerial Accounting | ||
دوره 8، شماره 31، آذر 2023، صفحه 87-102 اصل مقاله (440.17 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30495/ijfma.2023.21718 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
Maryam Mehrara 1؛ Amir Gholami 2؛ Seyed Mohammad Mehdi Ahmadi3 | ||
1Ph.D. student of Department of Economics, College of Management and Social Science, Tehran North Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
2Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, College of Management and Social Science, Tehran North Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran | ||
3Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, College of Management and Social Science, Tehran North Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
چکیده | ||
Our goal in this paper analysis the dynamics of national saving investment relationships between 1978 and 2017 in the economy of Iran to determine the degree of capital mobility. For this purpose, the validity of the Feldstein-Horioka hypothesis was tested by relying on the ARDL Bounds testing approach to co-integration and vector error correction model. The authors interpret the close relationship between national saving and investment in the long run as a reflection of a lack of capital mobility. These results suggest that the Feldstein-Horioka Hypothesis is applicable for the Iran economy in the period analyzed. The analysis of the time series characteristics of the current account balance shows that the current account balance does not have a unit root and the link between Iran's economy and international capital markets is not significant. We observed that trade openness, can't help explain the investment. Our findings for Iran suggest that home bias in the allocation of domestic savings significantly declines when domestic investment is financed by domestic savings alone. Furthermore, the empirical results indicate that the Feldstein-Horioka puzzle does not hold for the Iran economy. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
Capital Mobility؛ Feldstein-Horioka Hypothesis؛ openness؛ home bias؛ Iran | ||
مراجع | ||
Akkoyunlu, Ş. (2020). Revisiting the Feldstein-Horioka puzzle for Turkey. Journal of Applied Economics, 23(1), 129-148. 2) Apergis, N., Tsoumas, C. (2009). A survey of the Feldstein-Horioka puzzle: What has been done and where we stand. Research in Economics, 63(2), 64–76. 3) Bahmani-Oskooee, M., Chakrabarti, A. (2005). Openness, size, and the saving-investment relationship. Economic Systems. 29(3), 283–293. 4) Baltaci, N., & Ayaydin, H. (2013). Financial Openness and Capital Mobility: A Dynamic Panel Data Analysis. international research journal of finance and economics, (111), 185-194. 5) Baral, A. K. (2020). Application of ARDL Bound Cointegration Test on Money Output Relationship in Nepalese Economy. International Journal of Applied Economics and Econometrics.1(1), 43-55. 6) Baxter, M., Crucini, M. J. (1993). Explaining Saving/Investment Correlations. American Economic Review, 83(3), 416-436. 7) Bebczuk, R. N., Schmidt Hebbel, K. (2010). Revisiting the Feldstein-Horioka puzzle: an institutional sector view. Económica, 56, 1-36. 8) Bineau, Y. (2014). Regional Capital Mobility within Bulgaria. Journal of Global Economics, 2(2), 1-3. 9) Brown, R. L., Durbin, J., & Evans, J. M. (1975). Techniques for testing the constancy of regression relationships over time. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 37(2), 149-192. 10) Buch, C. M. (1999). Capital Mobility and EU Enlargement. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 135, 629–656. 102 / An Analytical Examination of the Degree of Capital Mobility in Iran Reappraisal … Vol.8 / No.31 / Autumn 2023 11) Coakley, J., Kulasi, F. (1997). Cointegration of Long Span Saving and Investment. Economics Letters, 54 (1), 1–6. 12) Coakley, J., Kulasi, F., Smith, R. (1996). Current Account Solvency and the Feldstein-Horioka Puzzle. The Economic Journal, 106(436), 620-27. 13) Cyrille, S. M. (2010). Saving-Investment Correlation and Capital Mobility in Sub-Saharan African Countries: A Reappraisal through Inward and Outward Capital Flows’ Correlation. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 2(2), 97-106. 14) De Vita, G., Abbott, A. (2002). Are Saving and Investment Cointegrated? An ARDL Bounds Testing Approach. Economics Letters, 77(2), 293–299. 15) Ehsani, M. A., Taheri Bazkhane, S. (2018). testing the validity of the Feldstein-horioka puzzle in Iran (considering Lucas critique). Journal of applied economics studies in Iran, 6(24), 1-22. 16) Feldstein, M., Horioka, C. (1980). Domestic savings and international capital flows. Economic Journal, 90(358), 314–329. 17) Feldstein, M. (1983). Domestic saving and international capital movements in the long run and the short run. European Economic Review 21(1-2), 129-51. 18) Fouquau, J., Hurlin, C., Rabaud, I. (2007). The Feldstein–Horioka puzzle: A panel smooth transition regression approach. Economic Modelling, 25(2), 284–299. 19) Frankel, J. (1992). Measuring international capital mobility: a review. American Economic Review 82(2), 197-202. 20) Georgopoulos G. and Hejazi W. (2005), Feldstein-Horioka meets time trend. Economic Letters, 86(3), 353-357. 21) Granger, C. (2001). Overview of nonlinear macro-econometric empirical models. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 5(4), 466-481. 22) Gundlach, E., Sinn, S. (1992). Unit root tests of the current account balance: implications for international capital mobility. Applied Economics, 24(6), 617-625. 23) Hassan, I. B., Azali, M., Lee, C. (2014). Feldstein–Horioka puzzle and international capital mobility in high-income countries: A pool mean group approach. Engineering Economics, 25(5), 480–486. 24) Holmes, M. J. (2005). What does Savings-Investment Correlation tell us about International Capital Mobility of Less Developed Countries? Journal for Economic Integration, 20 (3), 590-603. 25) Hoffmann, M. (2004). International Capital Mobility in the Long Run and the Short Run: Can We Still Learn from Saving-investment data? Journal of International Money and Finance, 23(1), 113–131. 26) Horioka, C. Y., Ford, N. (2017). The solution to the Feldstein-Horioka puzzle. ISER Discussion Paper 1016, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University, 1-25. 27) İyidoğan, P.V., Balіkçioğlu, E. (2010). The Feldstein- Horioka Relation in Turkey: An ARDL Bounds Testing Approach. Problems Perspect. Manage, 8(4), 29-35. 28) Johansen, S. (1995). Likelihood-Based Inference in Cointegrated Vector Autoregressive Models, Oxford University Press, Oxford. 29) Kumar, S., & Bhaskara Rao, B. (2011). A Time‐series Approach to the Feldstein–Horioka Puzzle with Panel Data from the OECD Countries. The World Economy, 34(3), 473-485. 30) Krol, R. (1996). International capital mobility: evidence from panel data. Journal of International Money and Finance, 15 (3), 467–474. 31) Litsios, I., Pilbeam, K. (2015). An empirical analysis of the nexus between investment, fiscal balances and current account balances in Greece, Portugal, and Spain. Economic Modelling, 63(C), 143-152. 32) Mastroyiannis, A. (2007). Current account dynamics and the Feldstein and Horioka puzzle: The case of Greece. The European Journal of Comparative Economics, 4(1), 91–99. 33) Mussa, M. M., & Goldstein, M. M. (1993). The integration of world capital markets. International Monetary Fund. International Monetary Fund Working Paper2075. 34) Natalya Ketenci, N. (2010). The Feldstein Horioka Puzzle by groups of OECD members: the panel approach. MPRA Paper, 25848, 1-26. 35) Obstfeld, M. (1986). How integrated are world capital markets? Some new tests. NBER Working Paper, 2075, 1-41. 36) Obstfeld, M., Kenneth, R. (1995). The Intertemporal Approach to the Current Account. International Journal of Finance and Managerial Accounting / 103 Vol.8 / No.31 / Autumn 2023 Handbook of International Economics, 3(34), 1731-1799. 37) Payne, J., Kumazawa, R. (2005). Capital mobility, foreign aid, and openness: Further panel data evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa. J Econ Financ, 29(1), 122-126. 38) Pesaran,M. H., Pesaran, B. (1997).Working with Microfit 4.0: interactive econometric analysis;[Windows version]. Oxford University Press. 39) Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y. (1999). An autoregressive distributed lag modeling approach to cointegration analysis. In S. Strom (Ed.), Econometrics and Economic Theory in the 20th Century: The Ragnar Frisch Centennial SymposiumCambridge. Cambridge University, 371–413. 40) Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., Smith, R. (2001). Bounds Testing Approaches to the Analysis of Level Relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289–326. 41) Raghuramapatruni, R., Surya Chaitanya, R. V. (2020). An appraisal of the impact of international trade on economic growth of India-through the ARDL approach. International Journal of Economics and Business Administration, VIII(2), 376-387. 42) Razak, L.A, Masih, M. (2017). Revisit Feldstein-Horioka puzzle: evidence from Malaysia (1960-2015) . MPRA Paper 79407, University Library of Munich, Germany, 1-29. 43) Tesar, L. (1991). Saving, Investment, and International Capital Flow. Journal of International Economics, 31(1-2), 55-78. 44) Wong, D. Y. (1990). What do saving-investment relationships tell us about capital mobility?. Journal of international Money and Finance, 9(1), 60-74. 45) Younas, j. (2007). Capital Mobility, Foreign Aid, and Openness: A Reappraisal', Economics Bulletin, 6 (12), 1–8. 46) Younas. J., Chakraborty, D. (2010). Globalization and the Feldstein–Horioka puzzle. Applied Economics, 43(16),2089–2096. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 102 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 138 |